- What should be the minimum number of required hours for a program? Should this vary by type of program or be the same for all programs?
|
|
|
- Should the standards be written in a competencies or a course work format? That is should we expect to see easily recognized courses in a required area or may the content be spread across the curriculum? And if spread, how far (across 2, 3, 5, etc. courses)?
|
|
|
- Should undergraduate courses be allowed to fulfill subject area requirements? Should programs have prerequisite undergraduate course requirements?
|
|
|
- What types and quantities of assessment experiences should be required?
|
|
|
- Should greater specificity be given to "coursework appropriate for the discipline?" What courses or topics would we expect to see included here?
|
|
|
- What further definition can be given to the requirement for "theory, application, and history in the subdiscipline?" What courses or topics would we expect to see included here?
|
|
|
- What specific activities should be required in practicum or internship? [or do we want to ask "should the activities to be required in practicum or internship be specified?]
|
|
|
- Should there be specialty standards for each subdiscipline (similar to those promulgated by SIOP for IO)? If so, how should they be developed - by CAMPP or by other professional groups?
|
|
|
- What are the expected maximum student/faculty ratios? Should "sufficient number of appropriately trained faculty" be defined?
|
|
|
- What types of distance learning experiences should be acceptable?
|
|
|
- What other issues are important to you related to the standards revision?
|
|